Despite an ample supply of oil and gas assets on the market due to low oil prices, the overall merger and acquisition (M&A) deal count in the upstream energy sector plunged in 2015 as the weakness and volatility in oil prices made it difficult for buyers and sellers to achieve consensus on value and outlook. These findings come from new analysis by IHS.
Despite the boost from Shell’s US$85 billion agreement to take over BG Group, total transaction value for global upstream oil and gas M&A deals in 2015 declined 22% to $143 billion from $184 billion in 2014, when transaction value rose 30% year-over-year. In 2015, several large, unsolicited corporate takeover bids were rejected and asset deal value fell to a 10-year low.
“Unstable oil prices caused outlook uncertainty in 2015, and this lack of stability, a key ingredient for buyers and sellers to reach consensus, caused fewer deals to be reached,” said Christopher Sheehan, director of energy M&A research at IHS, and lead author of the IHS Energy Global Upstream M & A Review. “There continues to be a wide disconnect between potential acquirers and sellers regarding valuations of the huge supply of assets on the market that vary in quality. At the same time, corporate takeover targets that suffered severe share price declines are reluctant to sell at modest current premiums in a weak market.”
“During 2015, traditional funding avenues remained generally available for [exploration and production companies], lessening the pressure to consolidate,” Sheehan said. “However, we believe the likelihood for wider consolidation in the oil and gas industry will increase in 2016 as producers face further financial pain and will have more constrained financing options due to persistently weak oil prices.”
The softness in deal activity during the final two months of 2014 carried over into early 2015, the IHS report noted, and while oil prices and deal flow briefly rebounded in the spring, volatile and declining crude prices during the remainder of 2015 kept many potential buyers and sellers on the sidelines.
According to IHS Energy M&A research, worldwide deal count (which includes both asset deals and corporate deals) fell by nearly 50% in 2015 to the lowest level since 2001. Asset deals represented 80% of total deals, but the number of both worldwide asset and corporate transactions fell steeply. Corporate deal count plunged to a 20-year low, according to IHS.
A significant development in 2015 was the emergence of more than $60 billion in unsolicited corporate takeover bids by larger, financially-stable companies that targeted more distressed peers. The rejection of these bids, compounded by low asset-deal value, dampened total transaction value. Other than Shell’s agreement to acquire BG, there were no corporate takeovers exceeding $5 billion. In 2015, there were fewer than 10 asset deals valued at greater than $1 billion, following more than 30 annually during each of the previous two years.
For the second consecutive year, Asian national oil companies (NOCs) reined in overseas acquisition spending, and their global market share for upstream oil and gas acquisitions in 2015 declined to the lowest level since 2007. Chinese NOCs, continuing to undergo internal restructuring, spent less than $5 billion on acquisitions for the second straight year. Meanwhile, financial buyers, led by private equity firms, spent more than $25 billion investing in acquisitions, joint ventures, and funding private exploration and production (E&P) companies.
Global spending on unconventional assets plunged to less than $30 billion in 2015 after topping more than $75 billion in 2014, causing its market share of total worldwide upstream deal value to decline from 40% to 20% in 2015. North America continued to be the dominant target for transactions of unconventional resources, led by deals in the US.
North America Accounted for 60% of Worldwide Deal Value for 2015
IHS found that North America, excluding the weighting of the globally-diversified Shell/BG deal, accounted for approximately 60% of worldwide upstream deal value for the second consecutive year. Canada’s market share fell slightly from 13% to 11%, with only one deal exceeding $1 billion. Oil sands deal activity continued to be relatively dormant for the third straight year. Excluding Shell’s agreement to purchase BG Group, the US represented 50% of global upstream oil and gas transaction value in 2015, similar to its share in 2014. The US accounted for slightly more than half the number of total worldwide deals, above its historical average. However, only three of the top 10 largest transactions in 2015 were in the US, versus five the prior year.
Total US transaction value declined by 60%—from almost $90 billion in 2014—to $35 billion in 2015. For the second consecutive year, four of the top five largest US deals targeted unconventional resources, led by Noble Energy’s $3.8 billion acquisition of Rosetta Resources. However, US corporate transaction value fell by more than 55% and US asset deal value declined by 70% to the lowest total since 2009.
“The continued weakness in commodity prices is having a dramatic impact on valuations in the asset transaction market,” Sheehan said. “Deal pricing for US oil and liquids proved reserve assets fell extremely sharply in 2015. US gas asset deal pricing also declined steeply. Asset deal market pricing in the US for both commodities plummeted to 10-year lows.”
Largest Global Deals in 2015 Were Focused Outside North America
Transactions outside North America dominated the top 10 largest global deals in 2015, after accounting for slightly less than half of the top 10 deals in 2014. The largest transactions featured globally-diversified deal activity in the Russia and Caspian, Asia-Pacific, Africa and Middle East and Europe. When including the Shell/BG deal, North America accounted for only 30% of global deal value.
“Our IHS analysis of upstream companies indicates that oil and gas producers with heavy debt burdens and hedges rolling off in 2016 will become increasingly vulnerable,” Sheehan said. “They will either have to dispose of prized assets, face serious restructuring -- including the potential for bankruptcy -- or become takeover targets in 2016,” Sheehan said. “The volume of global assets for sale and companies under financial duress are surging as oil prices continue to be subdued.”
Subscribe
